Publications of NIPGR Scientists

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://ndkr-library.nipgr.ac.in/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Lata, CharuSubject: search.filters.subject.Gene expression

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Drought stress responses and signal transduction in plants
    (Springer, 2015) Lata, Charu; Muthamilarasan, Mehanathan; Prasad, Manoj
    Nature provides all necessary components for healthy growth and development of plants in the form of air, water, light, nutrients, and soil. Any imbalance in the environmental harmony may cause stress to them. Stresses encountered by plants can broadly be categorized into biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotic stresses are mainly caused by pathogens and herbivory, whereas abiotic stresses include the threat imposed by drought, salinity, and extremes of temperature, heavy metals, and pollution. Drought stress is a major cause of yield instability in crops across diverse eco-geographic regions worldwide. A variety of biochemical, molecular, and physiological changes are manifested by plants in response to drought stress. The cellular abscisic acid (ABA) concentration increases on water deficit leading to the activation of a number of stress-responsive genes and the patterns of expression of these genes are very complex, with some genes being induced early while others respond slowly. In general, drought-responsive genes respond to salt and cold stresses as well as to exogenous ABA treatment. However, there are several genes, which express themselves in an ABA-independent manner suggesting that both ABA-dependent and -independent signal transduction cascades exist for drought stress perception, response, and adaptation. Drought stress response and adaptation in plants involves an array of pathways for signal perception, transduction, gene expression and synthesis of proteins, and other stress metabolites. Drought-responsive genes can mainly be classified into two groups. First group constitutes genes whose products provide osmotolerance and protection to plants thus directly functioning in tolerance to stress, while the second group includes genes playing a role in signal transduction as well as regulation of gene expression. This chapter summarizes the complex molecular mechanisms of drought stress response and adaptation in plants, highlighting the transcriptional regulation of stress-responsive gene expression. It also focuses on the recent advances in analyzing various stress-responsive pathways with prime emphasis on ABA-dependent and -independent pathways.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) during dehydration stress
    (Elsevier B.V., 2010) Lata, Charu; Sahu, Pranav Pankaj; Prasad, Manoj
    hydration stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses that adversely influence crop growth and productivity. With the aim to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying dehydration stress tolerance in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.), a drought tolerant crop, we examined its transcriptome changes at two time points (early and late) of dehydration stress. Two suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) forward libraries were constructed from 21-day old seedlings of tolerant cv. Prasad at 0.5 and 6h PEG-induced dehydration stress. A total of 327 unique ESTs were identified from both libraries and were classified into 11 different categories according to their putative functions. The plant response against dehydration stress was complex, representing major transcripts involved in metabolism, stress, signaling, transcription regulation, translation and proteolysis. By Reverse Northern (RN) technique we identified the differential expression pattern of 327 transcripts, 86 (about 26%) of which showed > or = 1.7-fold induction. Further the obtained results were validated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to have a comparative expression profiling of randomly chosen 9 up-regulated transcripts (> or =2.5 fold induction) between cv. Prasad (tolerant) and cv. Lepakshi (sensitive) upon dehydration stress. These transcripts showed a differential expression pattern in both cultivars at different time points of stress treatment as analyzed by qRT-PCR. The possible relationship of the identified transcripts with dehydration tolerance mechanism is discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    cDNA-AFLP analysis reveals differential gene expression in response to salt stress in foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)
    (Springer, 2008) Jayaraman, Ananthi; Puranik, Swati; Rai, Neeraj Kumar; Vidapu, Sudhakar; Sahu, Pranav Pankaj; Lata, Charu; Prasad, Manoj
    Plant growth and productivity are affected by various abiotic stresses such as heat, drought, cold, salinity, etc. The mechanism of salt tolerance is one of the most important subjects in plant science as salt stress decreases worldwide agricultural production. In our present study we used cDNA-AFLP technique to compare gene expression profiles of a salt tolerant and a salt-sensitive cultivar of foxtail millet (Seteria italica) in response to salt stress to identify early responsive differentially expressed transcripts accumulated upon salt stress and validate the obtained result through quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The expression profile was compared between a salt tolerant (Prasad) and susceptible variety (Lepakshi) of foxtail millet in both control condition (L0 and P0) and after 1 h (L1 and P1) of salt stress. We identified 90 transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) that are differentially expressed, out of which 86 TDFs were classified on the basis of their either complete presence or absence (qualitative variants) and 4 on differential expression pattern levels (quantitative variants) in the two varieties. Finally, we identified 27 non-redundant differentially expressed cDNAs that are unique to salt tolerant variety which represent different groups of genes involved in metabolism, cellular transport, cell signaling, transcriptional regulation, mRNA splicing, seed development and storage, etc. The expression patterns of seven out of nine such genes showed a significant increase of differential expression in tolerant variety after 1 h of salt stress in comparison to salt-sensitive variety as analyzed by qRT-PCR. The direct and indirect relationship of identified TDFs with salinity tolerance mechanism is discussed.