Institutional Publications

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ndkr-library.nipgr.ac.in/handle/123456789/11

Browse

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.Chitinase

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Rs_MEP1 is required for the pathogenesis of Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IA in plants
    (The American Phytopathological Society (APS), 2026) Pradhan, Amrita; Sahoo, Debashis; Bhati, Vikrant; Kumar, Rahul; Yadav, Rajni; Ghosh, Srayan; Pawar, Prashant Anupama-Mohan; Jha, Gopaljee
    Rhizoctonia solani AGI-IA is a polyphagous necrotrophic fungal pathogen that causes sheath blight disease in rice. Efforts are being made to identify pathogenicity-associated genes in R. solani and modulate them to develop a disease control strategy. Here, we investigate the roles of some predicted pathogenicity-associated genes of R. solani that have previously been reported to be upregulated during infection in rice. The tobacco rattle virus-based host-induced gene silencing of the selected pathogenicity-associated genes revealed that silencing of Rs_MEP1, a zinc-containing Peptidase_M43 domain-metalloprotease, severely compromises R. solani infection in tomato. Moreover, double-stranded RNA-mediated silencing of Rs_MEP1 prevented R. solani infection in rice. The signal sequence trap assay indicated the secretory nature of Rs_MEP1, while the reporter assay suggested its localization in the plant apoplast. Notably, agrobacterium-mediated transient overexpression of Rs_MEP1 induces necrotic cell death responses in plants. We provide evidence that Rs_MEP1 interacts with GH19 family of rice chitinases and potentially modulates their functions. Overall, our study emphasizes that Rs_MEP1 facilitates R. solani in promoting necrotic responses and targets rice GH19 chitinases to impart disease susceptibility in plants.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Chickpea chitinases responsive to Helicoverpa herbivory and phytohormone signaling: genome-wide identification, field expression profiling, and structure-guided prioritization
    (BioMed Central Ltd, 2026) Konda, Aravind Kumar; Annapragada, Harika; G K, Sujayanand; Singh, Pooja; Bhuvanachandra, Bhoopal; Chinnasamy, Hariharan V; Dixit, Girish Prasad; Gupta, Kapuganti Jagadis; Matheshwaran, Saravanan
    Background: Chitinases can contribute to plant defence against fungal pathogens and insect herbivores, but their family organization, inducible deployment, and putative ligand-recognition behaviour remain poorly resolved in chickpea. We combined genome-wide identification, field expression profiling under controlled Helicoverpa armigera infestation, hormone treatments, and structure-guided comparison of representative proteins to prioritize defence-associated chickpea chitinases. Results: We identified 28 chickpea chitinase loci (Car_Chits), comprising 22 glycosyl hydrolase family 18 (GH18) genes and 6 GH19 genes. Local duplication, especially tandem duplication within GH18, was the main contributor to family expansion, and interpretable duplicate pairs were retained mainly under purifying selection. Promoter scans indicated broad enrichment of defence- and hormone-associated cis-elements. Field quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) profiling of 11 candidate genes in field-grown plants subjected to controlled H. armigera infestation and hormone treatments showed treatment-specific temporal regulation. Car_Chit-4 (GH19) was strongly induced by salicylic acid (7.81-fold at 0.5 h; q < 0.05) but transiently repressed shortly after H. armigera feeding (0.15-fold at 0.5 h; q = 0.030). Car_Chit-19 (GH18) was the clearest herbivory-responsive gene, with late induction at 8 h (1.62-fold; q = 0.050) and 48 h (1.85-fold; q = 0.050). Jasmonic acid caused broad early repression across several genes, followed by delayed induction of Car_Chit-4 at 24 h. Seven Car_Chit-(GlcNAc)₄ complexes were modelled, docked, and simulated for 100 ns. GH18 proteins generally showed more favourable predicted MM-PBSA binding energies than GH19 proteins, but the structural metrics were interpreted as relative ligand-recognition indicators rather than direct evidence of anti-herbivore function. Car_Chit-17 had the most favourable predicted binding energy (ΔG_bind = - 18.51 ± 6.75 kcal/mol), whereas Car_Chit-14 and Car_Chit-27 retained the most stable ligand poses and Car_Chit-19 displayed the most stable protein scaffold. Conclusions: Chickpea chitinases show differentiated temporal responses to herbivory and hormone signalling. The study supports a working model in which GH19 Car_Chit-4 marks a rapid salicylic-acid-responsive arm, whereas GH18 Car_Chit-19 marks a delayed herbivory-responsive arm. A tiered prioritization framework separates expression-deployed candidates from structure-guided biochemical candidates, explaining why different genes emerge from qRT-PCR and molecular modelling analyses. The structural analyses provide complementary prioritization of Car_Chit-17, Car_Chit-14, and Car_Chit-27 for biochemical characterization. Together, these results provide a resource for dissecting chitinase-mediated defence in chickpea and for selecting candidates for functional validation.