Institutional Publications

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ndkr-library.nipgr.ac.in/handle/123456789/11

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Senthil-Kumar, MuthappaSubject: search.filters.subject.abiotic stress

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    When two negatives make a positive: The favorable impact of the combination of abiotic stress and pathogen infection on plants
    (Oxford University Press, 2024) Pandey, Prachi; Patil, Mahesh; Priya, Piyush; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
    Combined abiotic and biotic stresses modify plant defense signaling, leading to either the activation or suppression of defense responses. Although the majority of combined abiotic and biotic stresses reduce plant fitness, certain abiotic stresses reduce the severity of pathogen infection in plants. Remarkably, certain pathogens also improve the tolerance of some plants to a few abiotic stresses. While considerable research focuses on the detrimental impact of combined stresses on plants, the upside of combined stress remains hidden. This review succinctly discusses the interactions between abiotic stresses and pathogen infection that benefit plant fitness. Here, we discuss various factors that govern the positive influence of combined abiotic stress and pathogen infection on plant performance. We also provide a brief overview of the role of pathogens, mainly viruses, in improving plant responses to abiotic stresses. We further highlight the critical nodes in defense signaling that guide plant responses during abiotic stress towards enhanced resistance to pathogens. Studies on antagonistic interactions between abiotic and biotic stressors can uncover candidates in host plant defense that may shield plants from combined stresses.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 transporters function in tandem to modulate sugar flux in plants
    (John Wiley & Sons, 2023) Fatima, Urooj; Balasubramaniam, D.; Khan, Wajahat Ali; Kandpal, Manu; Vadassery, Jyothilakshmi; Arockiasamy, Arulandu; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
    The sugar will eventually be exported transporter (SWEET) members in Arabidopsis, AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 are the important sucrose efflux transporters that act synergistically to perform distinct physiological roles. These two transporters are involved in apoplasmic phloem loading, seed filling, and sugar level alteration at the site of pathogen infection. Here, we performed the structural analysis of the sucrose binding pocket of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 using molecular docking followed by rigorous molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We observed that the sucrose molecule binds inside the central cavity and in the middle of the transmembrane (TM) region of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12, that allows the alternate access to the sucrose molecule from either side of the membrane during transport. Both AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12, shares the similar amino acid residues that interact with sucrose molecule. Further, to achieve more insights on the role of these two transporters in other plant species, we did the phylogenetic and the in-silico analyses of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs from 39 economically important plants. We reported the extensive information on the gene structure, protein domain and cis-acting regulatory elements of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs from different plants. The cis-elements analysis indicates the involvement of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs in plant development and also during abiotic and biotic stresses. Both in silico and in planta expression analysis indicated AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 are well-expressed in the Arabidopsis leaf tissues. However, the orthologs of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 showed the differential expression pattern with high or no transcript expression in the leaf tissues of different plants. Overall, these results offer the new insights into the functions and regulation of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs from different plant species. This might be helpful in conducting the future studies to understand the role of these two crucial transporters in Arabidopsis and other crop plants.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Drought stress exacerbates fungal colonization and endodermal invasion and dampens defense responses to increase dry root rot in chickpea
    (American Phytopathological Society, 2022) Irulappan, Vadivelmurugan; Kandpal, Manu; Saini, Kumud; Rai, Avanish; Ranjan, Aashish; Sinharoy, Senjuti; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
    Drought plays a central role in increasing the incidence and severity of dry root rot (DRR) disease in chickpea. This is an economically devastating disease, compromising chickpea yields particularly severely in recent years due to erratic rainfall patterns. Macrophomina phaseolina (formerly Rhizoctonia bataticola) is the causal agent of DRR disease in the chickpea plant. The infection pattern in chickpea roots under well-watered conditions and drought stress are poorly understood at present. This study provides detailed disease symptomatology and the characteristics of DRR fungus at morphological and molecular levels. Using microscopy techniques, the infection pattern of DRR fungus in susceptible chickpea roots was investigated under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Our observations suggested that drought stress intensifies the progression of already ongoing infection by weakening the endodermal barrier and overall defense. Transcriptomic analysis suggested that the plant’s innate immune defense program is downregulated in infected roots when subjected to drought stress. Further, genes involved in hormonal regulation are differentially expressed under drought stress. These findings provide hints in terms of potential chickpea genes to target in crop improvement programs to develop climate change-resilient cultivars.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Progress and prospects of concurrent or combined stress studies in plants
    (John Wiley & Sons, 2021) Mahalingam, Ramamurthy; Pandey, Prachi; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
    Plants growing under field conditions are often exposed to multiple abiotic and biotic stresses occurring simultaneously or sequentially. Biotic stressors often interact with abiotic stressors at the plant interphase, which makes the impact of their combination on plants remarkably variable, though differing with order and intensity of stresses, as well as plant species and pathotypes. In this article, we examine the major abiotic stress combinations, as well as abiotic-biotic stress combinations, and physiological and molecular responses of plants to these combined stresses. Utilizing the available literature, information on the phenomic and transcriptomic response of plants to the combined abiotic and biotic stresses, and the cross-talk during signalling is reviewed. A succinct discussion on the scope and application of combined abiotic and biotic stress studies highlighting major gaps and novel avenues for further research is articulated.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Virus-induced gene silencing is a versatile tool for unraveling the functional relevance of multiple abiotic-stress-responsive genes in crop plants
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2014) Ramegowda, Venkategowda; Mysore, Kirankumar S.; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
    Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) is an effective tool for gene function analysis in plants. Over the last decade, VIGS has been successfully used as both a forward and reverse genetics technique for gene function analysis in various model plants, as well as crop plants. With the increased identification of differentially expressed genes under various abiotic stresses through high-throughput transcript profiling, the application of VIGS is expected to be important in the future for functional characterization of a large number of genes. In the recent past, VIGS was proven to be an elegant tool for functional characterization of genes associated with abiotic stress responses. In this review, we provide an overview of how VIGS is used in different crop species to characterize genes associated with drought-, salt-, oxidative- and nutrient-deficiency-stresses. We describe the examples from studies where abiotic stress related genes are characterized using VIGS. In addition, we describe the major advantages of VIGS over other currently available functional genomics tools. We also summarize the recent improvements, limitations and future prospects of using VIGS as a tool for studying plant responses to abiotic stresses.