Browsing by Author "Kandpal, Manu"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

An artificial neural network–based deep learning model to predict combined stress impact and interaction in plants
(John Wiley & Sons, 2026) Priya, Piyush; Pandey, Prachi; Jain, Rubi; Kandpal, Manu; Jain, Shradha; Chaudhury, Rim; Ramegowda, Venkategowda; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
Premise: Plants are frequently exposed to combinations of abiotic and biotic stresses that pose a greater threat to yield and productivity than individual stresses. However, knowledge of the impact of many stress combinations in numerous plants is limited due to the lack of experimental data, which could take decades to generate. To overcome this limitation, we utilized existing literature data from various plant species and stress combinations to derive biological inferences, thereby gaining a comprehensive understanding of plant responses through a computational tool. Methods: Public databases were used to gather literature on the impact of various abiotic and biotic stress combinations. Then, a composite artificial neural network (ANN)–based multi-target classification and regression deep learning model was developed using machine learning algorithms. Results: The model predicted the impact of stress interactions in plants, including the morphological parameters affected and percentage changes in those parameters, with an overall accuracy of 76.33%. Predicted reductions in yield were validated in rice under combined drought and heat stress. Discussion: The ANN-based model developed in this study is a valuable resource for plant researchers seeking to understand the impact of stress combinations. The tool can make use of multivariate and complex combined stress datasets.
AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 transporters function in tandem to modulate sugar flux in plants
(John Wiley & Sons, 2023) Fatima, Urooj; Balasubramaniam, D.; Khan, Wajahat Ali; Kandpal, Manu; Vadassery, Jyothilakshmi; Arockiasamy, Arulandu; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
The sugar will eventually be exported transporter (SWEET) members in Arabidopsis, AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 are the important sucrose efflux transporters that act synergistically to perform distinct physiological roles. These two transporters are involved in apoplasmic phloem loading, seed filling, and sugar level alteration at the site of pathogen infection. Here, we performed the structural analysis of the sucrose binding pocket of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 using molecular docking followed by rigorous molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We observed that the sucrose molecule binds inside the central cavity and in the middle of the transmembrane (TM) region of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12, that allows the alternate access to the sucrose molecule from either side of the membrane during transport. Both AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12, shares the similar amino acid residues that interact with sucrose molecule. Further, to achieve more insights on the role of these two transporters in other plant species, we did the phylogenetic and the in-silico analyses of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs from 39 economically important plants. We reported the extensive information on the gene structure, protein domain and cis-acting regulatory elements of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs from different plants. The cis-elements analysis indicates the involvement of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs in plant development and also during abiotic and biotic stresses. Both in silico and in planta expression analysis indicated AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 are well-expressed in the Arabidopsis leaf tissues. However, the orthologs of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 showed the differential expression pattern with high or no transcript expression in the leaf tissues of different plants. Overall, these results offer the new insights into the functions and regulation of AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 orthologs from different plant species. This might be helpful in conducting the future studies to understand the role of these two crucial transporters in Arabidopsis and other crop plants.
Drought attenuates plant responses to multiple rhizospheric pathogens: A study on a dry root rot-associated disease complex in chickpea fields
(Elsevier B.V., 2023) Chilakala, Aswin Reddy; Pandey, Prachi; Durgadevi, Athimoolam; Kandpal, Manu; Patil, Basavanagouda S.; Rangappa, Krishnappa; Reddy, Puli Chandra Obul; Ramegowda, Venkategowda; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
Context or problem: Root rots, a major factor contributing to yield loss in chickpea, often occur in disease complexes. Objective or research question: Plant responses to disease complexes are not well elucidated. We sought a clear understanding of a newly identified disease complex in chickpea, dry root rot (DRR)–wilt disease complex, in the field and studied the effect of drought on the severity of the complex and its effect on yield. We compared plant responses to DRR alone and the disease complex under drought and determined the phytohormones involved in plant defense against the disease complex. Methods: We compared the effect of 14 environments (two soil moisture regimes at seven locations) on the incidence of the disease complex and yield loss in four chickpea genotypes. We also studied the effect of drought on rhizospheric and root endo-microbial communities by whole-genome and metagenomic sequencing and performed LC-MS-based phytohormonal profiling of chickpea roots. Results: Soil moisture and plant genetic variability were critical in modulating disease incidence in field conditions. DRR was the primary driver of the disease complex under drought stress. Drought aggravated the yield reductions caused by the disease complex from 35% to 60% in susceptible genotypes. Further, drought-tolerant genotypes performed better under combined disease complex infection and drought stress and exhibited lesser yield losses than susceptible genotypes. Pathogenic fungi such as Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium oxysporum, and Rhizoctonia solani were enriched in the chickpea rhizosphere, and M. phaseolina was predominant in infected chickpea roots under both well-watered and drought conditions. Symbiotic associations of chickpea with nitrogen-fixing bacteria were suppressed under drought stress. Abscisic acid, jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid were found to be involved in defense against the disease complex across various stages of plant growth. Implications or significance: We highlight the interaction between drought and soil pathogens affecting chickpea yield and suggest the utilization of drought-tolerant root traits as donor traits for improving combined stress resistance. We also demonstrate growth stage–dependent phytohormonal responses elicited by DRR and the DRR–wilt disease complex. The identification and management of root rots is essential, and our findings offer valuable new insights into a lesser-known but highly significant disease complex of chickpea. Data availability statement: Manuscript data is available at Supplementary File S1. The soil microbe whole-genome and metagenome and root-microbe 16 S and ITS sequencing data are available at NCBI PRJNA871091 and PRJNA895851.
Drought stress exacerbates fungal colonization and endodermal invasion and dampens defense responses to increase dry root rot in chickpea
(American Phytopathological Society, 2022) Irulappan, Vadivelmurugan; Kandpal, Manu; Saini, Kumud; Rai, Avanish; Ranjan, Aashish; Sinharoy, Senjuti; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
Drought plays a central role in increasing the incidence and severity of dry root rot (DRR) disease in chickpea. This is an economically devastating disease, compromising chickpea yields particularly severely in recent years due to erratic rainfall patterns. Macrophomina phaseolina (formerly Rhizoctonia bataticola) is the causal agent of DRR disease in the chickpea plant. The infection pattern in chickpea roots under well-watered conditions and drought stress are poorly understood at present. This study provides detailed disease symptomatology and the characteristics of DRR fungus at morphological and molecular levels. Using microscopy techniques, the infection pattern of DRR fungus in susceptible chickpea roots was investigated under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Our observations suggested that drought stress intensifies the progression of already ongoing infection by weakening the endodermal barrier and overall defense. Transcriptomic analysis suggested that the plant’s innate immune defense program is downregulated in infected roots when subjected to drought stress. Further, genes involved in hormonal regulation are differentially expressed under drought stress. These findings provide hints in terms of potential chickpea genes to target in crop improvement programs to develop climate change-resilient cultivars.
Induced post-invasive defenses in the nonhost plant Parthenium hysterophorus L. prevent root cortical colonization by Macrophomina phaseolina and impart resistance to dry root rot
(Elsevier B.V., 2025) Mirchandani, Rishabh; Kandpal, Manu; Ranjan, Aashish; Sinharoy, Senjuti; Senthil-Kumar, Muthappa
Dry root rot (DRR) of chickpea is caused by the broad-range necrotrophic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina. Chickpea germplasm does not provide durable resistance to DRR, which is particularly devastating under drought. Even moderately resistant chickpea varieties become susceptible under combined stress. We hypothesized that nonhost resistance (NHR) is durable even under combined stress. Using the blotter paper assay and stereomicroscopic observations, we identified the asterid weed Parthenium hysterophorus as a potential nonhost of M. phaseolina among 82 potential nonhosts. Epidermal necrotic lesions were prevented in P. hysterophorus. In planta fungal load was 0.195 and 0.007 ng/ng total DNA in chickpea and P. hysterophorus, respectively. M. phaseolina could not colonize the P. hysterophorus root while up to 6 cortical cell layers were colonized in chickpea. Further, NHR was durable under combined stress. Dual RNA sequencing revealed that M. phaseolina actively attempted to infect the nonhost and activated specific genes in the xenobiotics degradation pathway. P. hysterophorus also showed an active defense response with1958 and 2294 differentially expressed genes at 2 and 4 DAI, respectively, with 363 upregulated at both time points. Differential expression of cell wall synthesis, phytohormone signaling, and other defense response pathways likely contributes to NHR. Few genes in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways in P. hysterophorus were also upregulated, possibly because these metabolites are linked to the distinct changes in the fungus during nonhost infection. We therefore conclude that P. hysterophorus exhibits post-invasive NHR to M. phaseolina and that general defense, phytohormone signaling and secondary metabolic pathways contribute to NHR.